[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <tip-3a90795e1e885167209056a1a90be965add30e25@git.kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 4 Jul 2017 03:48:36 -0700
From: tip-bot for Thomas Gleixner <tipbot@...or.com>
To: linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc: dianders@...omium.org, julia@...com, linus.walleij@...aro.org,
mingo@...nel.org, briannorris@...omium.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, marc.zyngier@....com,
john@...anate.com, heiko@...ech.de, tglx@...utronix.de,
hpa@...or.com
Subject: [tip:irq/urgent] genirq: Move bus locking into __setup_irq()
Commit-ID: 3a90795e1e885167209056a1a90be965add30e25
Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/3a90795e1e885167209056a1a90be965add30e25
Author: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
AuthorDate: Thu, 29 Jun 2017 23:33:36 +0200
Committer: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
CommitDate: Tue, 4 Jul 2017 12:46:15 +0200
genirq: Move bus locking into __setup_irq()
There is no point in having the irq_bus_lock() protection around all
callers to __setup_irq().
Move it into __setup_irq(). This is also a preparatory patch for addressing
the issues with the irq resource callbacks.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>
Cc: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>
Cc: Julia Cartwright <julia@...com>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc: Brian Norris <briannorris@...omium.org>
Cc: Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
Cc: linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org
Cc: John Keeping <john@...anate.com>
Cc: linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170629214343.960949031@linutronix.de
---
kernel/irq/manage.c | 13 +++++--------
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/irq/manage.c b/kernel/irq/manage.c
index 5c11c17..0934e02 100644
--- a/kernel/irq/manage.c
+++ b/kernel/irq/manage.c
@@ -1167,6 +1167,8 @@ __setup_irq(unsigned int irq, struct irq_desc *desc, struct irqaction *new)
if (desc->irq_data.chip->flags & IRQCHIP_ONESHOT_SAFE)
new->flags &= ~IRQF_ONESHOT;
+ chip_bus_lock(desc);
+
/*
* The following block of code has to be executed atomically
*/
@@ -1347,6 +1349,7 @@ __setup_irq(unsigned int irq, struct irq_desc *desc, struct irqaction *new)
}
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&desc->lock, flags);
+ chip_bus_sync_unlock(desc);
irq_setup_timings(desc, new);
@@ -1378,6 +1381,8 @@ mismatch:
out_unlock:
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&desc->lock, flags);
+ chip_bus_sync_unlock(desc);
+
out_thread:
if (new->thread) {
struct task_struct *t = new->thread;
@@ -1417,9 +1422,7 @@ int setup_irq(unsigned int irq, struct irqaction *act)
if (retval < 0)
return retval;
- chip_bus_lock(desc);
retval = __setup_irq(irq, desc, act);
- chip_bus_sync_unlock(desc);
if (retval)
irq_chip_pm_put(&desc->irq_data);
@@ -1674,9 +1677,7 @@ int request_threaded_irq(unsigned int irq, irq_handler_t handler,
return retval;
}
- chip_bus_lock(desc);
retval = __setup_irq(irq, desc, action);
- chip_bus_sync_unlock(desc);
if (retval) {
irq_chip_pm_put(&desc->irq_data);
@@ -1924,9 +1925,7 @@ int setup_percpu_irq(unsigned int irq, struct irqaction *act)
if (retval < 0)
return retval;
- chip_bus_lock(desc);
retval = __setup_irq(irq, desc, act);
- chip_bus_sync_unlock(desc);
if (retval)
irq_chip_pm_put(&desc->irq_data);
@@ -1980,9 +1979,7 @@ int request_percpu_irq(unsigned int irq, irq_handler_t handler,
return retval;
}
- chip_bus_lock(desc);
retval = __setup_irq(irq, desc, action);
- chip_bus_sync_unlock(desc);
if (retval) {
irq_chip_pm_put(&desc->irq_data);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists