[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHKzcENQoMJ3MXwm-1dxasuRBrDuNd6mtkcjXZhVA0kNu4+8AA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Jul 2017 12:58:04 +0200
From: Waldemar Rymarkiewicz <waldemar.rymarkiewicz@...il.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: "Bartholomae, Thomas" <t.bartholomae@...el.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>
Subject: Re: Where to update regulator register with initial voltage set by HW
Hi Mark,
On 3 July 2017 at 17:36, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 03, 2017 at 05:33:03PM +0200, Waldemar Rymarkiewicz wrote:
>
>> I've asked also on TI forum if this is typical to the regulator not to
>> determine the startup voltage but still waiting for feedback. Anyway,
>> if this is the case I guess a driver is a good place to update
>> register before we register to the regulator framework.
>
> It's really unusual to have a device that has the voltage changable by
> register write at runtime where the current state can't be read back.
or you did not realise that this is initialised by bootloader for example.
After investigating this issue a bit more I've found that this is
rather typical for power regulators not to update a register with
startup voltage set by a feedback resistor divider as it would cost
extra circuit. So, I assume that most likely a bootloader normally
initializes power regulator in case it's needed eg. if it's supplying
CPU which is DVS-enabled.
Anyway, it's more clear now to me how this should be done.
/Waldek
Powered by blists - more mailing lists