lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 4 Jul 2017 15:41:10 +0200 (CEST)
From:   Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To:     Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@...hat.com>
cc:     Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, Bernhard Held <berny156@....de>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
        Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@...com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...e.com>,
        Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>,
        Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] X86: don't report PAT on CPUs that don't support it

On Mon, 3 Jul 2017, Mikulas Patocka wrote:
> Is there any progress with this patch? Will you accept it or do you want 
> some changes to it?

Aside of the unparseable changelog, that patch is mostly duct tape.

1) __pat_enabled should be renamed to pat_disabled, as that is the actual
   purpose of that variable

2) Making the call to init_cache_modes() conditional in setup_arch() is
   pointless. init_cache_modes() has it's own protection against multiple
   invocations.

3) It adds yet another invocation of init_cache_modes() instead of getting
   rid of the ones in pat_disable() and the pat disabled case in pat_init().

I've reworked the whole thing into the patch below.

Thanks,

	tglx

8<---------------------
Subject: x86/mm/pat: Don't report PAT on CPUs that don't support it
From: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@...hat.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Jun 2017 18:49:39 -0400 (EDT)

The pat_enabled() logic is broken on CPUs which do not support PAT and
where the initialization code fails to call pat_init(). Due to that the
enabled flag stays true and pat_enabled() returns true wrongfully.

As a consequence the mappings, e.g. for Xorg, are set up with the wrong
caching mode and the required MTRR setups are omitted.

To cure this the following changes are required:

  1) Make pat_enabled() return true only if PAT initialization was
     invoked and successful.

  2) Invoke init_cache_modes() unconditionally in setup_arch() and
     remove the extra callsites in pat_disable() and the pat disabled
     code path in pat_init().

Also rename __pat_enabled to pat_disabled to reflect the real purpose of
this variable.

Signed-off-by: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@...hat.com>
Cc: Bernhard Held <berny156@....de>
Cc: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@...com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>
Cc: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...e.com>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>

---
 arch/x86/include/asm/pat.h |    1 +
 arch/x86/kernel/setup.c    |    7 +++++++
 arch/x86/mm/pat.c          |   22 +++++++++-------------
 3 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/pat.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/pat.h
@@ -7,6 +7,7 @@
 bool pat_enabled(void);
 void pat_disable(const char *reason);
 extern void pat_init(void);
+extern void init_cache_modes(void);
 
 extern int reserve_memtype(u64 start, u64 end,
 		enum page_cache_mode req_pcm, enum page_cache_mode *ret_pcm);
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c
@@ -1076,6 +1076,13 @@ void __init setup_arch(char **cmdline_p)
 	max_possible_pfn = max_pfn;
 
 	/*
+	 * This call is required when the CPU does not support PAT. If
+	 * mtrr_bp_init() invoked it already via pat_init() the call has no
+	 * effect.
+	 */
+	init_cache_modes();
+
+	/*
 	 * Define random base addresses for memory sections after max_pfn is
 	 * defined and before each memory section base is used.
 	 */
--- a/arch/x86/mm/pat.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/pat.c
@@ -37,14 +37,13 @@
 #undef pr_fmt
 #define pr_fmt(fmt) "" fmt
 
-static bool boot_cpu_done;
-
-static int __read_mostly __pat_enabled = IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_X86_PAT);
-static void init_cache_modes(void);
+static bool __read_mostly boot_cpu_done;
+static bool __read_mostly pat_disabled = !IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_X86_PAT);
+static bool __read_mostly pat_initialized;
 
 void pat_disable(const char *reason)
 {
-	if (!__pat_enabled)
+	if (pat_disabled)
 		return;
 
 	if (boot_cpu_done) {
@@ -52,10 +51,8 @@ void pat_disable(const char *reason)
 		return;
 	}
 
-	__pat_enabled = 0;
+	pat_disabled = true;
 	pr_info("x86/PAT: %s\n", reason);
-
-	init_cache_modes();
 }
 
 static int __init nopat(char *str)
@@ -67,7 +64,7 @@ early_param("nopat", nopat);
 
 bool pat_enabled(void)
 {
-	return !!__pat_enabled;
+	return pat_initialized;
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pat_enabled);
 
@@ -225,6 +222,7 @@ static void pat_bsp_init(u64 pat)
 	}
 
 	wrmsrl(MSR_IA32_CR_PAT, pat);
+	__pat_initialized = true;
 
 	__init_cache_modes(pat);
 }
@@ -242,7 +240,7 @@ static void pat_ap_init(u64 pat)
 	wrmsrl(MSR_IA32_CR_PAT, pat);
 }
 
-static void init_cache_modes(void)
+void init_cache_modes(void)
 {
 	u64 pat = 0;
 	static int init_cm_done;
@@ -306,10 +304,8 @@ void pat_init(void)
 	u64 pat;
 	struct cpuinfo_x86 *c = &boot_cpu_data;
 
-	if (!pat_enabled()) {
-		init_cache_modes();
+	if (pat_disabled)
 		return;
-	}
 
 	if ((c->x86_vendor == X86_VENDOR_INTEL) &&
 	    (((c->x86 == 0x6) && (c->x86_model <= 0xd)) ||


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ