[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170704152206.GB11168@linux-80c1.suse>
Date: Tue, 4 Jul 2017 08:22:06 -0700
From: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@...tuozzo.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@...il.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [patch V2 2/2] mm/memory-hotplug: Switch locking to a percpu
rwsem
On Tue, 04 Jul 2017, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
>As a side effect you end up optimizing get/put_online_mems() at the cost
>of more overhead for the actual hotplug operation, which is rare and of less
>performance importance.
So nm this, the reader side actually gets _more_ expensive with pcpu-rwsems
due to at least two full barriers for each get/put operation.
Thanks,
Davidlohr
Powered by blists - more mailing lists