[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170703222745.5f1bb399@cakuba.netronome.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2017 22:27:45 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>
To: Dison River <pwn2river@...il.com>
Cc: samuel@...tiz.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, qca_merez@....qualcomm.com,
kvalo@...eaurora.org, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
davem@...emloft.net, oss-drivers@...ronome.com,
security@...nel.org, wil6210@....qualcomm.com
Subject: Re: 'skb' buffer address information leakage
On Tue, 4 Jul 2017 13:12:18 +0800, Dison River wrote:
> drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/nfp_net_debugfs.c:167
> seq_printf(file, " frag=%p", skb);
FWIW that's actually not a skb pointer. The structure is defined like
this:
struct nfp_net_tx_buf {
union {
struct sk_buff *skb;
void *frag;
};
dma_addr_t dma_addr;
short int fidx;
u16 pkt_cnt;
u32 real_len;
};
So the line in question is actually reading the frag pointer, I just
reused the skb variable, because this has to be read via READ_ONCE()
and NULL-checked so I thought that doing it separately for skb and
frag is a waste of LOC especially in debug code. I will queue up a
clean up for after the merge window.
Thanks!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists