[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <595BB3AF.3000304@iogearbox.net>
Date: Tue, 04 Jul 2017 17:26:39 +0200
From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
To: Colin King <colin.king@...onical.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
CC: kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Lawrence Brakmo <brakmo@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH][bpf-next] bpf: add missing break in for the TCP_BPF_SNDCWND_CLAMP
case
[ +Lawrence ]
On 07/04/2017 05:21 PM, Colin King wrote:
> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
>
> There appears to be a missing break in the TCP_BPF_SNDCWND_CLAMP case.
> Currently the non-error path where val is greater than zero falls through
> to the default case that sets the error return to -EINVAL. Add in
> the missing break.
>
> Detected by CoverityScan, CID#1449376 ("Missing break in switch")
>
> Fixes: 13bf96411ad2 ("bpf: Adds support for setting sndcwnd clamp")
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
> ---
> net/core/filter.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/net/core/filter.c b/net/core/filter.c
> index 94169572d002..c7f737058d89 100644
> --- a/net/core/filter.c
> +++ b/net/core/filter.c
> @@ -2867,6 +2867,7 @@ BPF_CALL_5(bpf_setsockopt, struct bpf_sock_ops_kern *, bpf_sock,
> tp->snd_cwnd_clamp = val;
> tp->snd_ssthresh = val;
> }
> + break;
> default:
> ret = -EINVAL;
> }
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists