[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20170704093006.a4c82ae49fe1660f7e19e075@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 4 Jul 2017 09:30:06 +0900
From: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, shuah@...nel.org,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
naresh.kamboju@...aro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] selftests: ftrace: Do not failure if there is
unsupported tests
On Mon, 3 Jul 2017 11:59:06 -0400
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:
> On Tue, 4 Jul 2017 00:52:32 +0900
> Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > Can we add an option in kselftest, or to ftracetest that decides if
> > > unsupported is a failure or not? Otherwise I can not ack this patch.
> >
> > I would rather like to add an option to ftracetest instead of
> > kselftest, because whether the tested feature should be supported
> > or not is hard to decide from testing framework. It should be
> > checked by manual.
>
> Can we do both? That is, add an option to have ftracetest not fail on
> "unsupported" but have it fail by default. We can have kselftest just
> pass in a parameter to ftracetest that has unsupported not fail?
I rather like to treat unsupported as success (or XFAIL) by default
and add "--fail-unsupported" option.
Thank you,
> But if that is too difficult, then I can live with modifying my test
> case to add the option.
>
> -- Steve
--
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists