linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] audit: Reduce overhead using a coarse clock

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CABeXuvpZBGhnStC9+oi720wk7KmvP_w3=bZdM5yOijDN=15a+Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 4 Jul 2017 12:41:45 -0700
From:   Deepa Dinamani <deepa.kernel@...il.com>
To:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc:     Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>,
        Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>,
        Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@...hat.com>,
        Tony Jones <tonyj@...e.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] audit: Reduce overhead using a coarse clock

On Tue, Jul 4, 2017 at 12:20 PM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 4, 2017 at 2:11 PM, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net> wrote:
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>
>
> Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>

Acked-by: Deepa Dinamani <deepa.kernel@...il.com>

As already Arnd pointed out, your patch should be fine as that is how
it was before my patch. Since nobody saw any problems before my patch,
lower granularity should be fine.

-Deepa