[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170705074018.5cfee177@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2017 07:40:18 +1000
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Sebastian Ott <sebott@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the block tree
Hi Guenter,
On Tue, 4 Jul 2017 08:15:57 -0700 Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 08:54:09PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> >
> > After merging the block tree, today's linux-next build (s390x
> > s390-defconfig) failed like this:
> >
> > drivers/s390/block/scm_blk.c:293:10: error: 'BLK_MQ_RQ_QUEUE_BUSY' undeclared (first use in this function)
> > drivers/s390/block/scm_blk.c:327:9: error: 'BLK_MQ_RQ_QUEUE_OK' undeclared (first use in this function)
> >
> > Caused by commit
> >
> > fc17b6534eb8 ("blk-mq: switch ->queue_rq return value to blk_status_t")
> >
> > interacting with commit
> >
> > 12d907626539 ("s390/scm: convert to blk-mq")
> >
> > from the s390 tree.
> >
> > Is the following the correct merge fixup?
> >
>
> The failure made int into Linus' tree, but the fix didn't. Is the fix pending
> in some other queue or does it have to be (re-)submitted ?
It will be my in fixes tree today and until it appears in Linus' or the
s390 tree.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
Powered by blists - more mailing lists