[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170705164850.lnziwloc6mko3mxo@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2017 18:48:50 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Ben Guthro <ben@...hro.net>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: Potential scheduler regression
On Wed, Jul 05, 2017 at 11:42:46AM -0400, Ben Guthro wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've been in the process of updating our kernel in our appliance VM
> from an old LTS kernel (4.1.y) to something a bit more modern (4.9.y)
> - and ran into a performance regression, when our QA team was running
> some regression suites.
>
>
> I bisect this behavior to the following commit, introduced in the 4.9
> merge window:
>
Could you test a later kernel that includes commit:
1ad3aaf3fcd2 ("sched/core: Implement new approach to scale select_idle_cpu()")
Powered by blists - more mailing lists