[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+55aFyXuKacpuzPhNtnUkOtXKmKAF3vEyVtCtFXpWTH7LZDoQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2017 09:53:55 -0700
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
"the arch/x86 maintainers" <x86@...nel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@...il.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 00/10] PCID and improved laziness
On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 1:56 AM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> If it's all super stable I plan to tempt Linus with a late merge window pull
> request for all these preparatory patches. (Unless he objects that is. Hint, hint.)
I don't think I'll object. At some point the best testing is "lots of users".
TLB issues are a bitch to debug, but at the same time this is clearly
a "..but at some point we need to bite the bullet" case. I doubt the
series is going to get a lot better.
But yes, please do give it as much testing as humanly possible even
without the wider coverage by random people.
Linus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists