[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+55aFzD2rW05RQ1ATZ09=qAut_uxW=jW7SUyfhSNyNyRP37yw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2017 12:21:32 -0700
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>
Cc: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
"Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Larry Woodman <lwoodman@...hat.com>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@...isc-linux.org>,
Helge Diller <deller@....de>,
James Hogan <james.hogan@...tec.com>,
Laura Abbott <labbott@...hat.com>, Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>,
"security@...nel.org" <security@...nel.org>,
Qualys Security Advisory <qsa@...lys.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ximin Luo <infinity0@...ian.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: larger stack guard gap, between vmas
On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 12:18 PM, Willy Tarreau <w@....eu> wrote:
>
> But only if the sysctl is set. It can simply be recommended to set it
> if any program fails. We've done this for many years with other ones
> like min_mmap_addr or tcp_ecn.
Ok, fair enough. I don't hate the approach, and maybe it's simpler
overall, and would help find other potential problem spots.
*Hopefully* it was just that Rust thing and the nasty Java exec-shield
workaround, but yeah, those might just be the first ones that have
been found so far.
Linus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists