[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170705192545.GI27350@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2017 16:25:45 -0300
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
To: Arun Kalyanasundaram <arunkaly@...gle.com>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
Tom Zanussi <tzanussi@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
David Carrillo-Cisneros <davidcc@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: perf script: Question: Python trace processing script contains
the tid of the process in the common_pid attribute
Em Wed, Jul 05, 2017 at 09:22:07AM -0700, Arun Kalyanasundaram escreveu:
> Hi Arnaldo,
>
> Thank you for your reply.
> I actually meant tracepoint event handlers: def
> trace_unhandled(event_name, context, event_fields_dict)
> The dict parameter contains an attribute "common_pid" which is
> actually the "tid" of the thread. There are no other attributes that
> contain the actual pid of the process. So, I was wondering if this is
> something intentional? If not I can share a patch to fix this.
Yeah there is a problem in:
tools/perf/util/scripting-engines/trace-event-python.c
static void python_process_event(union perf_event *event,
struct perf_sample *sample,
struct perf_evsel *evsel,
struct addr_location *al)
{
struct tables *tables = &tables_global;
switch (evsel->attr.type) {
case PERF_TYPE_TRACEPOINT:
python_process_tracepoint(sample, evsel, al);
break;
/* Reserve for future process_hw/sw/raw APIs */
default:
if (tables->db_export_mode)
db_export__sample(&tables->dbe, event, sample, evsel, al);
else
python_process_general_event(sample, evsel, al);
}
}
The python_process_tracepoint() thing predates
python_process_general_event(), and doesn't adds the dict with all the
perf_sample entries that python_process_general_event() passes to the
python method :-\
Both the per-tracepoint python hooks _and_ trace_unhandled() should get
that dict, is that what your patch does?
- Arnaldo
> Best,
> - Arun
>
>
> On Sat, Jul 1, 2017 at 7:47 AM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
> <acme@...hat.com> wrote:
> > Em Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 03:40:57PM -0700, Arun Kalyanasundaram escreveu:
> >> The handlers in the python script generated from "perf script" have an
> >> attribute: common_pid. This attribute contains the tid of the process
> >> instead of its pid. I would like to know if this is the expected behavior.
> >> There are no other attributes in the Python handler that provide the pid
> >> and knowing the process id is useful to be able to group all samples that
> >> belong to the same process that generated different threads.
> >
> > Humm, you have:
> >
> > def process_event(param_dict):
> > event_attr = param_dict["attr"]
> > sample = param_dict["sample"]
> > raw_buf = param_dict["raw_buf"]
> > comm = param_dict["comm"]
> > name = param_dict["ev_name"]
> >
> > And then, on sample you have (from a recent python script for processing
> > Intel PT samples):
> >
> > def print_common_start(comm, sample, name):
> > ts = sample["time"]
> > cpu = sample["cpu"]
> > pid = sample["pid"]
> > tid = sample["tid"]
> > print "%16s %5u/%-5u [%03u] %9u.%09u %7s:" % (comm, pid, tid, cpu, ts / 1000000000, ts %1000000000, name),
> >
> > - Arnaldo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists