linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4.9 000/172] 4.9.36-stable review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20170705053030.GA6786@kroah.com>
Date:   Wed, 5 Jul 2017 07:30:30 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@...aro.org>
Cc:     LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
        Shuah Khan <shuahkh@....samsung.com>, patches@...nelci.org,
        Ben Hutchings <ben.hutchings@...ethink.co.uk>,
        "# 3.4.x" <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.9 000/172] 4.9.36-stable review

On Tue, Jul 04, 2017 at 10:02:27PM +0530, Sumit Semwal wrote:
> Hi Greg,
> 
> On 3 July 2017 at 19:03, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.9.36 release.
> > There are 172 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> >
> > Responses should be made by Wed Jul  5 13:33:25 UTC 2017.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> >
> > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> >         kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.9.36-rc1.gz
> > or in the git tree and branch at:
> >   git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-4.9.y
> > and the diffstat can be found below.
> >
> Built with arm64 defconfig, and boot-tested on hikey. No regressions noted.

Great, thanks for testing and letting me know.

greg k-h