linux-kernel - Re: [git pull] vfs.git part 5

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20170705205204.GE10672@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Date:   Wed, 5 Jul 2017 21:52:04 +0100
From:   Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
To:     Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:     Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [git pull] vfs.git part 5

On Wed, Jul 05, 2017 at 01:33:52PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 12:15 AM, Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk> wrote:
> >
> >         That's probably it for today; again, I apologize for the amount of
                            ^^^^^^^^^^^^
> > pull requests, but the tree topologydd is really nasty this cycle.

> There is *no* reason to apologize.
> 
> Really - I *much* rather do five separate pull requests where each
> pull has a stated reason and target, than do one big mixed-up one.

Well...  There's another ten or so left.  I can certainly do them
one by one (and will probably have to - the graph is eye-watering
and personally I would hate to have to review it in one go, especially
since there's a couple of places where one branch is pulled in the
middle of another), but I wonder if you'll start cursing the number
of pull requests by the end of it...