linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/5] Make PDF builds work again

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CA+r1Zhg=5sd6qvW=dVvg0SOhEfMQmYvTMhFyLniCbZLuTke-6A@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 5 Jul 2017 14:22:35 -0700
From:   Jim Davis <jim.epost@...il.com>
To:     Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
Cc:     Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
        linux-doc <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...pensource.com>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] Make PDF builds work again

On Mon, Jul 3, 2017 at 5:44 AM, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net> wrote:
> On Mon, 3 Jul 2017 10:25:38 +0200
> Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch> wrote:
>
>> Only now stumbled over the full thread, but the drm patch is already
>> queued up for at least 4.13 (Dave was out and all that). I guess we could
>> try to cherry-pick through stable.
>
> I kind of gave up on the 4.12 goal, at least for now.  The number of
> complaints has not been huge - I suspect you're far from the only one who
> is not too worried about building PDFs...:)

If fixing pdf (and ps) builds isn't worth the bother -- which I
wouldn't debate -- then it's best to just drop those build targets.
The only worrisome thing I see here is having build targets carried
from release to release that don't work.

-- 
Jim