[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1499289735-14220-22-git-send-email-linuxram@us.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2017 14:21:58 -0700
From: Ram Pai <linuxram@...ibm.com>
To: linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org, x86@...nel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
Cc: benh@...nel.crashing.org, paulus@...ba.org, mpe@...erman.id.au,
khandual@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
bsingharora@...il.com, dave.hansen@...el.com, hbabu@...ibm.com,
linuxram@...ibm.com, arnd@...db.de, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
corbet@....net, mingo@...hat.com
Subject: [RFC v5 21/38] powerpc: implementation for arch_override_mprotect_pkey()
arch independent code calls arch_override_mprotect_pkey()
to return a pkey that best matches the requested protection.
This patch provides the implementation.
Signed-off-by: Ram Pai <linuxram@...ibm.com>
---
arch/powerpc/include/asm/pkeys.h | 10 ++++++-
arch/powerpc/mm/pkeys.c | 47 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 55 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pkeys.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pkeys.h
index f148e84..20846c2 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pkeys.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pkeys.h
@@ -13,6 +13,11 @@ static inline u64 pkey_to_vmflag_bits(u16 pkey)
((pkey & 0x10UL) ? VM_PKEY_BIT4 : 0x0UL));
}
+static inline int vma_pkey(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
+{
+ return (vma->vm_flags & ARCH_VM_PKEY_FLAGS) >> VM_PKEY_SHIFT;
+}
+
#define arch_max_pkey() 32
#define AMR_AD_BIT 0x1UL
#define AMR_WD_BIT 0x2UL
@@ -102,11 +107,12 @@ static inline int execute_only_pkey(struct mm_struct *mm)
return __execute_only_pkey(mm);
}
-
+extern int __arch_override_mprotect_pkey(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
+ int prot, int pkey);
static inline int arch_override_mprotect_pkey(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
int prot, int pkey)
{
- return 0;
+ return __arch_override_mprotect_pkey(vma, prot, pkey);
}
extern int __arch_set_user_pkey_access(struct task_struct *tsk, int pkey,
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/mm/pkeys.c b/arch/powerpc/mm/pkeys.c
index 6c90317..c60a045 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/mm/pkeys.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/mm/pkeys.c
@@ -123,3 +123,50 @@ int __execute_only_pkey(struct mm_struct *mm)
mm->context.execute_only_pkey = execute_only_pkey;
return execute_only_pkey;
}
+
+static inline bool vma_is_pkey_exec_only(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
+{
+ /* Do this check first since the vm_flags should be hot */
+ if ((vma->vm_flags & (VM_READ | VM_WRITE | VM_EXEC)) != VM_EXEC)
+ return false;
+
+ return (vma_pkey(vma) == vma->vm_mm->context.execute_only_pkey);
+}
+
+/*
+ * This should only be called for *plain* mprotect calls.
+ */
+int __arch_override_mprotect_pkey(struct vm_area_struct *vma, int prot,
+ int pkey)
+{
+ /*
+ * Is this an mprotect_pkey() call? If so, never
+ * override the value that came from the user.
+ */
+ if (pkey != -1)
+ return pkey;
+
+ /*
+ * If the currently associated pkey is execute-only,
+ * but the requested protection requires read or write,
+ * move it back to the default pkey.
+ */
+ if (vma_is_pkey_exec_only(vma) &&
+ (prot & (PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE)))
+ return 0;
+
+ /*
+ * the requested protection is execute-only. Hence
+ * lets use a execute-only pkey.
+ */
+ if (prot == PROT_EXEC) {
+ pkey = execute_only_pkey(vma->vm_mm);
+ if (pkey > 0)
+ return pkey;
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * nothing to override.
+ */
+ return vma_pkey(vma);
+}
--
1.7.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists