[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1499289735-14220-29-git-send-email-linuxram@us.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2017 14:22:05 -0700
From: Ram Pai <linuxram@...ibm.com>
To: linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org, x86@...nel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
Cc: benh@...nel.crashing.org, paulus@...ba.org, mpe@...erman.id.au,
khandual@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
bsingharora@...il.com, dave.hansen@...el.com, hbabu@...ibm.com,
linuxram@...ibm.com, arnd@...db.de, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
corbet@....net, mingo@...hat.com
Subject: [RFC v5 28/38] powerpc: implementation for arch_vma_access_permitted()
This patch provides the implementation for
arch_vma_access_permitted(). Returns true if the
requested access is allowed by pkey associated with the
vma.
Signed-off-by: Ram Pai <linuxram@...ibm.com>
---
arch/powerpc/include/asm/mmu_context.h | 5 ++++
arch/powerpc/mm/pkeys.c | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/mmu_context.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/mmu_context.h
index da7e943..bf69ff9 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/mmu_context.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/mmu_context.h
@@ -175,11 +175,16 @@ static inline void arch_bprm_mm_init(struct mm_struct *mm,
{
}
+#ifdef CONFIG_PPC64_MEMORY_PROTECTION_KEYS
+bool arch_vma_access_permitted(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
+ bool write, bool execute, bool foreign);
+#else /* CONFIG_PPC64_MEMORY_PROTECTION_KEYS */
static inline bool arch_vma_access_permitted(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
bool write, bool execute, bool foreign)
{
/* by default, allow everything */
return true;
}
+#endif /* CONFIG_PPC64_MEMORY_PROTECTION_KEYS */
#endif /* __KERNEL__ */
#endif /* __ASM_POWERPC_MMU_CONTEXT_H */
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/mm/pkeys.c b/arch/powerpc/mm/pkeys.c
index 044a17d..f89a048 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/mm/pkeys.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/mm/pkeys.c
@@ -201,3 +201,43 @@ bool arch_pte_access_permitted(u64 pte, bool write, bool execute)
return pkey_access_permitted(pte_to_pkey_bits(pte),
write, execute);
}
+
+/*
+ * We only want to enforce protection keys on the current process
+ * because we effectively have no access to AMR/IAMR for other
+ * processes or any way to tell *which * AMR/IAMR in a threaded
+ * process we could use.
+ *
+ * So do not enforce things if the VMA is not from the current
+ * mm, or if we are in a kernel thread.
+ */
+static inline bool vma_is_foreign(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
+{
+ if (!current->mm)
+ return true;
+ /*
+ * if the VMA is from another process, then AMR/IAMR has no
+ * relevance and should not be enforced.
+ */
+ if (current->mm != vma->vm_mm)
+ return true;
+
+ return false;
+}
+
+bool arch_vma_access_permitted(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
+ bool write, bool execute, bool foreign)
+{
+ int pkey;
+
+ /* allow access if the VMA is not one from this process */
+ if (foreign || vma_is_foreign(vma))
+ return true;
+
+ pkey = vma_pkey(vma);
+
+ if (!pkey)
+ return true;
+
+ return pkey_access_permitted(pkey, write, execute);
+}
--
1.7.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists