[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a7a611a6-1544-ae69-9068-0c65ca6313cf@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2017 14:47:47 +0900
From: Taeung Song <treeze.taeung@...il.com>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <arnaldo.melo@...il.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
Milian Wolff <milian.wolff@...b.com>
Subject: [QUESTION] perf annotate: how do we fix the 'total period' feature ?
Hi,
Two problems of perf-annotate were mentioned in recent PATCH reviews
by Milian and Namhyung.
Currently perf-annotate has a '--show-total-period' option
and a 't' key "Toggle total period view" on TUI browser.
However, they actually show the number of samples, not period(Raw number
of event count of sample).
So it's a different number to the perf report like below.
For example,
$ perf report --stdio --show-nr-sample --show-total-period -S hex2u64
...
# Overhead Samples Period Command Shared Object
# ........ ............ ............ ....... .............
#
3.07% 36 26484668 perf perf
$ perf annotate --stdio --show-total-period -s hex2u64
Percent | Source code & Disassembly of perf for cycles:ppp (36
samples)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
:
:
:
: Disassembly of section .text:
:
: 000000000053ef9e <hex2u64>:
: hex2u64():
0 : 53ef9e: push %rbp
0 : 53ef9f: mov %rsp,%rbp
0 : 53efa2: sub $0x30,%rsp
1 : 53efa6: callq 424810
<pthread_attr_setdetachstate@...+0x10>
0 : 53efab: mov %rdi,-0x28(%rbp)
2 : 53efaf: mov %rsi,-0x30(%rbp)
...
Problems:
1) the total period of perf-annotate is different from perf-report's
2) perf-annotate only shows the first column as 'Percent'
(even though the number of samples for each addr are actually printed)
So we need to just rename it ? ('total period' -> 'samples')
Or,
we should enable perf-annotate to support both features for 'periods'
and 'samples' ?
Thanks,
Taeung
Powered by blists - more mailing lists