[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1499289735-14220-20-git-send-email-linuxram@us.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2017 14:21:56 -0700
From: Ram Pai <linuxram@...ibm.com>
To: linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org, x86@...nel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
Cc: benh@...nel.crashing.org, paulus@...ba.org, mpe@...erman.id.au,
khandual@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
bsingharora@...il.com, dave.hansen@...el.com, hbabu@...ibm.com,
linuxram@...ibm.com, arnd@...db.de, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
corbet@....net, mingo@...hat.com
Subject: [RFC v5 19/38] powerpc: introduce execute-only pkey
This patch provides the implementation of execute-only pkey.
The architecture-independent expects the ability to create
and manage a special key which has execute-only permission.
Signed-off-by: Ram Pai <linuxram@...ibm.com>
---
arch/powerpc/include/asm/book3s/64/mmu.h | 1 +
arch/powerpc/include/asm/pkeys.h | 6 +++-
arch/powerpc/mm/pkeys.c | 59 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
3 files changed, 65 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/book3s/64/mmu.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/book3s/64/mmu.h
index 104ad72..0c0a2a8 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/book3s/64/mmu.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/book3s/64/mmu.h
@@ -116,6 +116,7 @@ struct patb_entry {
* bit unset -> key available for allocation
*/
u32 pkey_allocation_map;
+ s16 execute_only_pkey; /* key holding execute-only protection */
#endif
} mm_context_t;
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pkeys.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pkeys.h
index 1495342..4b01c37 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pkeys.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pkeys.h
@@ -86,11 +86,13 @@ static inline int mm_pkey_free(struct mm_struct *mm, int pkey)
* Try to dedicate one of the protection keys to be used as an
* execute-only protection key.
*/
+extern int __execute_only_pkey(struct mm_struct *mm);
static inline int execute_only_pkey(struct mm_struct *mm)
{
- return 0;
+ return __execute_only_pkey(mm);
}
+
static inline int arch_override_mprotect_pkey(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
int prot, int pkey)
{
@@ -108,5 +110,7 @@ static inline int arch_set_user_pkey_access(struct task_struct *tsk, int pkey,
static inline void pkey_mm_init(struct mm_struct *mm)
{
mm_pkey_allocation_map(mm) = PKEY_INITIAL_ALLOCAION;
+ /* -1 means unallocated or invalid */
+ mm->context.execute_only_pkey = -1;
}
#endif /*_ASM_PPC64_PKEYS_H */
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/mm/pkeys.c b/arch/powerpc/mm/pkeys.c
index d3ba167..6c90317 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/mm/pkeys.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/mm/pkeys.c
@@ -64,3 +64,62 @@ int __arch_set_user_pkey_access(struct task_struct *tsk, int pkey,
return 0;
}
+
+#define pkeyshift(pkey) ((arch_max_pkey()-pkey-1) * AMR_BITS_PER_PKEY)
+
+static inline bool pkey_allows_readwrite(int pkey)
+{
+ int pkey_shift = pkeyshift(pkey);
+
+ if (!(read_uamor() & (0x3UL << pkey_shift)))
+ return true;
+
+ return !(read_amr() & ((AMR_AD_BIT|AMR_WD_BIT) << pkey_shift));
+}
+
+int __execute_only_pkey(struct mm_struct *mm)
+{
+ bool need_to_set_mm_pkey = false;
+ int execute_only_pkey = mm->context.execute_only_pkey;
+ int ret;
+
+ /* Do we need to assign a pkey for mm's execute-only maps? */
+ if (execute_only_pkey == -1) {
+ /* Go allocate one to use, which might fail */
+ execute_only_pkey = mm_pkey_alloc(mm);
+ if (execute_only_pkey < 0)
+ return -1;
+ need_to_set_mm_pkey = true;
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * We do not want to go through the relatively costly
+ * dance to set AMR if we do not need to. Check it
+ * first and assume that if the execute-only pkey is
+ * readwrite-disabled than we do not have to set it
+ * ourselves.
+ */
+ if (!need_to_set_mm_pkey &&
+ !pkey_allows_readwrite(execute_only_pkey))
+ return execute_only_pkey;
+
+ /*
+ * Set up AMR so that it denies access for everything
+ * other than execution.
+ */
+ ret = __arch_set_user_pkey_access(current, execute_only_pkey,
+ (PKEY_DISABLE_ACCESS | PKEY_DISABLE_WRITE));
+ /*
+ * If the AMR-set operation failed somehow, just return
+ * 0 and effectively disable execute-only support.
+ */
+ if (ret) {
+ mm_set_pkey_free(mm, execute_only_pkey);
+ return -1;
+ }
+
+ /* We got one, store it and use it from here on out */
+ if (need_to_set_mm_pkey)
+ mm->context.execute_only_pkey = execute_only_pkey;
+ return execute_only_pkey;
+}
--
1.7.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists