[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170705213746.6hf5af57ty6wsfgs@piout.net>
Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2017 23:37:46 +0200
From: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>
To: Amelie Delaunay <amelie.delaunay@...com>
Cc: Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@...ertech.it>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...com>,
rtc-linux@...glegroups.com, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] rtc: stm32: add STM32H7 RTC support
Hi,
This is mostly fine, even if I'm not too happy with the
s/ck_rtc/rtc_ck/.
On 26/06/2017 at 11:51:29 +0200, Amelie Delaunay wrote:
> - rtc->ck_rtc = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, NULL);
> - if (IS_ERR(rtc->ck_rtc)) {
> - dev_err(&pdev->dev, "no ck_rtc clock");
> - return PTR_ERR(rtc->ck_rtc);
> + match = of_match_device(stm32_rtc_of_match, &pdev->dev);
> + if (match && match->data)
> + rtc->data = (struct stm32_rtc_data *)match->data;
> + else
> + return -EINVAL;
This will never happen, you can remove that test.
--
Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists