lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1499291458-30231-16-git-send-email-sstabellini@kernel.org>
Date:   Wed,  5 Jul 2017 14:50:56 -0700
From:   Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@...nel.org>
To:     xen-devel@...ts.xen.org
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, sstabellini@...nel.org,
        jgross@...e.com, boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com,
        Stefano Stabellini <stefano@...reto.com>
Subject: [PATCH v7 16/18] xen/pvcalls: implement read

When an active socket has data available, increment the io and read
counters, and schedule the ioworker.

Implement the read function by reading from the socket, writing the data
to the data ring.

Set in_error on error.

Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini <stefano@...reto.com>
Reviewed-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>
CC: boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com
CC: jgross@...e.com
---
 drivers/xen/pvcalls-back.c | 85 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 85 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/xen/pvcalls-back.c b/drivers/xen/pvcalls-back.c
index a5f11d5..970db9d 100644
--- a/drivers/xen/pvcalls-back.c
+++ b/drivers/xen/pvcalls-back.c
@@ -98,6 +98,81 @@ static int pvcalls_back_release_active(struct xenbus_device *dev,
 
 static void pvcalls_conn_back_read(void *opaque)
 {
+	struct sock_mapping *map = (struct sock_mapping *)opaque;
+	struct msghdr msg;
+	struct kvec vec[2];
+	RING_IDX cons, prod, size, wanted, array_size, masked_prod, masked_cons;
+	int32_t error;
+	struct pvcalls_data_intf *intf = map->ring;
+	struct pvcalls_data *data = &map->data;
+	unsigned long flags;
+	int ret;
+
+	array_size = XEN_FLEX_RING_SIZE(map->ring_order);
+	cons = intf->in_cons;
+	prod = intf->in_prod;
+	error = intf->in_error;
+	/* read the indexes first, then deal with the data */
+	virt_mb();
+
+	if (error)
+		return;
+
+	size = pvcalls_queued(prod, cons, array_size);
+	if (size >= array_size)
+		return;
+	spin_lock_irqsave(&map->sock->sk->sk_receive_queue.lock, flags);
+	if (skb_queue_empty(&map->sock->sk->sk_receive_queue)) {
+		atomic_set(&map->read, 0);
+		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&map->sock->sk->sk_receive_queue.lock,
+				flags);
+		return;
+	}
+	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&map->sock->sk->sk_receive_queue.lock, flags);
+	wanted = array_size - size;
+	masked_prod = pvcalls_mask(prod, array_size);
+	masked_cons = pvcalls_mask(cons, array_size);
+
+	memset(&msg, 0, sizeof(msg));
+	msg.msg_iter.type = ITER_KVEC|WRITE;
+	msg.msg_iter.count = wanted;
+	if (masked_prod < masked_cons) {
+		vec[0].iov_base = data->in + masked_prod;
+		vec[0].iov_len = wanted;
+		msg.msg_iter.kvec = vec;
+		msg.msg_iter.nr_segs = 1;
+	} else {
+		vec[0].iov_base = data->in + masked_prod;
+		vec[0].iov_len = array_size - masked_prod;
+		vec[1].iov_base = data->in;
+		vec[1].iov_len = wanted - vec[0].iov_len;
+		msg.msg_iter.kvec = vec;
+		msg.msg_iter.nr_segs = 2;
+	}
+
+	atomic_set(&map->read, 0);
+	ret = inet_recvmsg(map->sock, &msg, wanted, MSG_DONTWAIT);
+	WARN_ON(ret > wanted);
+	if (ret == -EAGAIN) /* shouldn't happen */
+		return;
+	if (!ret)
+		ret = -ENOTCONN;
+	spin_lock_irqsave(&map->sock->sk->sk_receive_queue.lock, flags);
+	if (ret > 0 && !skb_queue_empty(&map->sock->sk->sk_receive_queue))
+		atomic_inc(&map->read);
+	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&map->sock->sk->sk_receive_queue.lock, flags);
+
+	/* write the data, then modify the indexes */
+	virt_wmb();
+	if (ret < 0)
+		intf->in_error = ret;
+	else
+		intf->in_prod = prod + ret;
+	/* update the indexes, then notify the other end */
+	virt_wmb();
+	notify_remote_via_irq(map->irq);
+
+	return;
 }
 
 static void pvcalls_conn_back_write(struct sock_mapping *map)
@@ -169,6 +244,16 @@ static void pvcalls_sk_state_change(struct sock *sock)
 
 static void pvcalls_sk_data_ready(struct sock *sock)
 {
+	struct sock_mapping *map = sock->sk_user_data;
+	struct pvcalls_ioworker *iow;
+
+	if (map == NULL)
+		return;
+
+	iow = &map->ioworker;
+	atomic_inc(&map->read);
+	atomic_inc(&map->io);
+	queue_work(iow->wq, &iow->register_work);
 }
 
 static struct sock_mapping *pvcalls_new_active_socket(
-- 
1.9.1

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ