linux-kernel - [PATCH] PCI / PM: Fix native PME handling during system suspend/resume

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <3705400.FL23FbEzsj@aspire.rjw.lan>
Date:   Thu, 06 Jul 2017 02:32:02 +0200
From:   "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
To:     Linux PCI <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:     Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
        Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
        Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Sadashiva Rao Pv <sadashiva.rao.pv@...el.com>,
        Naresh Solanki <naresh.solanki@...el.com>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
Subject: [PATCH] PCI / PM: Fix native PME handling during system suspend/resume

From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>

Commit 76cde7e49590 (PCI / PM: Make PCIe PME interrupts wake up from
suspend-to-idle) went too far with preventing pcie_pme_work_fn() from
clearing the root port's PME Status and re-enabling the PME interrupt
which should be done for PMEs to work correctly after system resume.

The failing scenario is as follows:

 1. pcie_pme_suspend() finds that the PME IRQ should be designated
    for system wakeup, so it calls enable_irq_wake() and then sets
    data->suspend_level to PME_SUSPEND_WAKEUP.

 2. PME interrupt happens at this point.

 3. pcie_pme_irq() runs, disables the PME interrupt and queues up
    the execution of pcie_pme_work_fn().

 4. pcie_pme_work_fn() runs before pcie_pme_resume() and breaks out
    of the loop right away, because data->suspend_level is not 
    PME_SUSPEND_NONE, and it doesn't re-enable the PME interrupt
    for the same reason.

 5. pcie_pme_resume() runs and simply calls disable_irq_wake()
    without re-enabling the PME interrupt (because data->suspend_level
    is not PME_SUSPEND_NONE), so the PME interrupt remains disabled
    and the PME Status remains set.

To fix this notice that there is no reason why pcie_pme_work_fn()
should behave in a special way during system resume if the PME
interrupt is not disabled by pcie_pme_suspend() and partially revert
commit 76cde7e49590 and restore the previous (and correct) behavior
of pcie_pme_work_fn().

Fixes: 76cde7e49590 (PCI / PM: Make PCIe PME interrupts wake up from suspend-to-idle)
Reported-by: Naresh Solanki <naresh.solanki@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
---
 drivers/pci/pcie/pme.c |   35 +++++++++++++----------------------
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)

Index: linux-pm/drivers/pci/pcie/pme.c
===================================================================
--- linux-pm.orig/drivers/pci/pcie/pme.c
+++ linux-pm/drivers/pci/pcie/pme.c
@@ -40,17 +40,11 @@ static int __init pcie_pme_setup(char *s
 }
 __setup("pcie_pme=", pcie_pme_setup);
 
-enum pme_suspend_level {
-	PME_SUSPEND_NONE = 0,
-	PME_SUSPEND_WAKEUP,
-	PME_SUSPEND_NOIRQ,
-};
-
 struct pcie_pme_service_data {
 	spinlock_t lock;
 	struct pcie_device *srv;
 	struct work_struct work;
-	enum pme_suspend_level suspend_level;
+	bool noirq; /* If set, keep the PME interrupt disabled. */
 };
 
 /**
@@ -228,7 +222,7 @@ static void pcie_pme_work_fn(struct work
 	spin_lock_irq(&data->lock);
 
 	for (;;) {
-		if (data->suspend_level != PME_SUSPEND_NONE)
+		if (data->noirq)
 			break;
 
 		pcie_capability_read_dword(port, PCI_EXP_RTSTA, &rtsta);
@@ -255,7 +249,7 @@ static void pcie_pme_work_fn(struct work
 		spin_lock_irq(&data->lock);
 	}
 
-	if (data->suspend_level == PME_SUSPEND_NONE)
+	if (!data->noirq)
 		pcie_pme_interrupt_enable(port, true);
 
 	spin_unlock_irq(&data->lock);
@@ -378,7 +372,7 @@ static int pcie_pme_suspend(struct pcie_
 {
 	struct pcie_pme_service_data *data = get_service_data(srv);
 	struct pci_dev *port = srv->port;
-	bool wakeup, wake_irq_enabled = false;
+	bool wakeup;
 	int ret;
 
 	if (device_may_wakeup(&port->dev)) {
@@ -388,19 +382,16 @@ static int pcie_pme_suspend(struct pcie_
 		wakeup = pcie_pme_check_wakeup(port->subordinate);
 		up_read(&pci_bus_sem);
 	}
-	spin_lock_irq(&data->lock);
 	if (wakeup) {
 		ret = enable_irq_wake(srv->irq);
-		if (ret == 0) {
-			data->suspend_level = PME_SUSPEND_WAKEUP;
-			wake_irq_enabled = true;
-		}
-	}
-	if (!wake_irq_enabled) {
-		pcie_pme_interrupt_enable(port, false);
-		pcie_clear_root_pme_status(port);
-		data->suspend_level = PME_SUSPEND_NOIRQ;
+		if (!ret)
+			return 0;
 	}
+
+	spin_lock_irq(&data->lock);
+	pcie_pme_interrupt_enable(port, false);
+	pcie_clear_root_pme_status(port);
+	data->noirq = true;
 	spin_unlock_irq(&data->lock);
 
 	synchronize_irq(srv->irq);
@@ -417,15 +408,15 @@ static int pcie_pme_resume(struct pcie_d
 	struct pcie_pme_service_data *data = get_service_data(srv);
 
 	spin_lock_irq(&data->lock);
-	if (data->suspend_level == PME_SUSPEND_NOIRQ) {
+	if (data->noirq) {
 		struct pci_dev *port = srv->port;
 
 		pcie_clear_root_pme_status(port);
 		pcie_pme_interrupt_enable(port, true);
+		data->noirq = false;
 	} else {
 		disable_irq_wake(srv->irq);
 	}
-	data->suspend_level = PME_SUSPEND_NONE;
 	spin_unlock_irq(&data->lock);
 
 	return 0;