[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACVXFVOJcJY3wYbm6LgqSDm021O+Uk-yNm9zcoLeYR+=Rn_bzg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2017 15:12:31 +0800
From: Ming Lei <tom.leiming@...il.com>
To: Ye Xiaolong <xiaolong.ye@...el.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com>,
Linux SCSI List <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
LKP ML <lkp@...org>
Subject: Re: [lkp-robot] [scsi] 5c279bd9e4: blogbench.read_score -10.0% regression
On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 10:54 AM, Ye Xiaolong <xiaolong.ye@...el.com> wrote:
> Hi, Ming Lei
>
> On 07/06, Ming Lei wrote:
>>Hi Xiaolong,
>>
>>On Mon, Jul 3, 2017 at 10:57 AM, kernel test robot
>><xiaolong.ye@...el.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Greeting,
>>>
>>> FYI, we noticed a -10.0% regression of blogbench.read_score due to commit:
>>
>>Looks like related with mq scheduler, could you test the following patch to see
>>if your issue can be fixed?
>>
>>https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/axboe/linux-block.git/commit/?h=for-linus&id=32825c45ff8f4cce937ab85b030dc693ceb1aa0a
>>
>
> Here is the comparison of commit 5c279bd9e4 and 32825c45, it does help recover
> performance back.
That is great, thanks for your test!
This patch has been in block tree, and will be pushed to v4.13.
Thanks,
Ming
Powered by blists - more mailing lists