[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b3fc8328-3929-7aac-8b59-da71401ab853@arm.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2017 08:43:35 +0100
From: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>
To: Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@...wei.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ma Jun <majun258@...wei.com>,
Agustin Vega-Frias <agustinv@...eaurora.org>,
John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>,
Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] genirq: Get the fwnode back for irqchips being probed
via ACPI namespace
On 06/07/17 05:35, Hanjun Guo wrote:
> From: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@...aro.org>
>
> commit d59f6617eef0 (genirq: Allow fwnode to carry name information only)
> forgot to do "domain->fwnode = fwnode;" for irqchips being probed via
> ACPI namesapce (DSDT/SSDT), that will break platforms with irqchip such
> as mbigen or qcom irq combiner, set the fwnode back to fix the issue.
>
> Reported-by: John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>
> Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@...aro.org>
> ---
> kernel/irq/irqdomain.c | 3 +--
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/irq/irqdomain.c b/kernel/irq/irqdomain.c
> index 14fe862..1bc38fa 100644
> --- a/kernel/irq/irqdomain.c
> +++ b/kernel/irq/irqdomain.c
> @@ -151,7 +151,6 @@ struct irq_domain *__irq_domain_add(struct fwnode_handle *fwnode, int size,
> domain->flags |= IRQ_DOMAIN_NAME_ALLOCATED;
> break;
> default:
> - domain->fwnode = fwnode;
> domain->name = fwid->name;
> break;
> }
> @@ -172,7 +171,6 @@ struct irq_domain *__irq_domain_add(struct fwnode_handle *fwnode, int size,
> strreplace(name, '/', ':');
>
> domain->name = name;
> - domain->fwnode = fwnode;
> domain->flags |= IRQ_DOMAIN_NAME_ALLOCATED;
> }
>
> @@ -196,6 +194,7 @@ struct irq_domain *__irq_domain_add(struct fwnode_handle *fwnode, int size,
> INIT_RADIX_TREE(&domain->revmap_tree, GFP_KERNEL);
> domain->ops = ops;
> domain->host_data = host_data;
> + domain->fwnode = fwnode;
> domain->hwirq_max = hwirq_max;
> domain->revmap_size = size;
> domain->revmap_direct_max_irq = direct_max;
>
This doesn't seem right.
Why is is_fwnode_irqchip() returning false when presented with an
irqchip probed via the ACPI namespace? That's what you should consider
fixing instead of moving that code around.
Thanks,
M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
Powered by blists - more mailing lists