[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+55aFxXPnNo_tkKb-3iyeRb1Vugfcg=1z9vc7ZmYzxZb5237w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2017 18:15:05 -0700
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>
Cc: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] printk for 4.13
On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 5:44 PM, Sergey Senozhatsky
<sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com> wrote:
>
> PRINTK_NMI_DEFERRED_CONTEXT_MASK calls into vprintk_deferred(), which
> does vprintk_emit(0, LOGLEVEL_SCHED, NULL, 0, fmt, args). and
> vprintk_emit() LOGLEVEL_SCHED is nothing, but printk_deferred(), which
> never calls into the scheduler and does not even try to lock console_sem.
Hmm. Ok. I think I see what you're saying. We're just adding it to the
log buffer, but not actually going through the whole "lets see if we
can push it further".
So I will take another look tomorrow, right now I'm feeling a bit
merged out for the day,
Linus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists