[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1499338639.19466.25.camel@perches.com>
Date: Thu, 06 Jul 2017 03:57:19 -0700
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
Klaus-Dieter Wacker <kdwacker@...ibm.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Julian Wiedmann <jwi@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Ursula Braun <ubraun@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/18] drivers: s390: Move static and inline before
return type
On Thu, 2017-07-06 at 12:29 +0200, Heiko Carstens wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 05, 2017 at 01:02:21PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> > Make the code like the rest of the kernel.
[]
> > diff --git a/drivers/s390/net/qeth_l3_main.c b/drivers/s390/net/qeth_l3_main.cqq
[]
> > @@ -2408,7 +2408,7 @@ static int qeth_l3_do_ioctl(struct net_device *dev, struct ifreq *rq, int cmd)
> > return rc;
> > }
> >
> > -int inline qeth_l3_get_cast_type(struct qeth_card *card, struct sk_buff *skb)
> > +inline int qeth_l3_get_cast_type(struct qeth_card *card, struct sk_buff *skb)
> > {
>
> Actually the function could be made static, and "inline" should be removed,
> considering the large function body.
I agree to a certain extent.
It's only used once and it looks like Klaus-Dieter Wacker
just missed adding static to this function.
$ git log --stat -p -1 ce73e10ee0cb6
commit ce73e10ee0cb6cde1c5075a2803da0f0eb5b2324
Author: Klaus-Dieter Wacker <kdwacker@...ibm.com>
But it also looks like inline is too often used in several
drivers/s390/net/*.c files, where most of those static inline
functions are only used once.
$ git grep -w inline drivers/s390/net/*.c | wc -l
42
Maybe inline removals should be a separate pass for all those.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists