linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4/5] powernv:idle: Move initialization of sibling pacas to pnv_alloc_idle_core

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20170707011609.76c51329@roar.ozlabs.ibm.com>
Date:   Fri, 7 Jul 2017 01:16:09 +1000
From:   Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>
To:     "Gautham R. Shenoy" <ego@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc:     Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
        Michael Neuling <mikey@...ling.org>,
        Vaidyanathan Srinivasan <svaidy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Shilpasri G Bhat <shilpa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
        Akshay Adiga <akshay.adiga@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-pm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] powernv:idle: Move initialization of sibling pacas
 to pnv_alloc_idle_core_states

On Wed,  5 Jul 2017 22:08:15 +0530
"Gautham R. Shenoy" <ego@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:

> From: "Gautham R. Shenoy" <ego@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> 
> On POWER9 DD1, in order to get around a hardware issue, we store in
> every CPU thread's paca the paca pointers of all its siblings.
> 
> Move this code into pnv_alloc_idle_core_states() soon after the space
> for saving the sibling pacas is allocated.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Gautham R. Shenoy <ego@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>

> -	if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_POWER9_DD1)) {
> -		int cpu;
> -
> -		pr_info("powernv: idle: Saving PACA pointers of all CPUs in their thread sibling PACA\n");
> -		for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
> -			int base_cpu = cpu_first_thread_sibling(cpu);
> -			int idx = cpu_thread_in_core(cpu);
> -			int i;
> -

You could move the thread_sibling_pacas allocation to here?

Speaking of which... core_idle_state and thread_sibling_pacas are
allocated with kmalloc_node... What happens if we take an SLB miss
in the idle wakeup code on these guys? Nothing good I think. Perhaps
we should put them into the pacas or somewhere in bolted memory.

Good cleanup though.

Reviewed-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>