linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] ARM: owl: smp: Drop owl_secondary

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <c037a437-0e9e-e451-d3a6-3a866db8bb16@suse.de>
Date:   Thu, 6 Jul 2017 19:17:28 +0200
From:   Andreas Färber <afaerber@...e.de>
To:     Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Cc:     support@...aker.org,
        张天益 <tyzhang@...ions-semi.com>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        梅利 <harrymei@...ions-semi.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Thomas Liau <thomas.liau@...ions-semi.com>,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>, support@...ietech.com,
        lee@...ietech.com,
        张东风 <zhangdf@...ions-semi.com>,
        刘炜 <liuwei@...ions-semi.com>,
        Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
        Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
        Gregory Clement <gregory.clement@...e-electrons.com>,
        Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com>,
        Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@...libre.com>,
        Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com>,
        Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: owl: smp: Drop owl_secondary_boot()

Am 05.07.2017 um 04:36 schrieb Florian Fainelli:
> On July 4, 2017 4:32:18 PM PDT, "Andreas Färber" <afaerber@...e.de> wrote:
>> Commit 18cfd9429d8a82c49add8f3ca9d366599bfcac45 ("ARM: owl: smp: Drop
>> bogus holding pen") simplified the S500 SMP code by removing a loop for
>> pen_release in owl_secondary_boot(). Since then it is only calling
>> owl_v7_invalidate_l1() before branching to secondary_startup().
>>
>> The owl_v7_invalidate_l1() assembler function is superfluous, too.
>> Therefore drop owl_secondary_boot() and use secondary_boot() directly.
>>
>> Cc: David Liu <liuwei@...ions-semi.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Andreas Färber <afaerber@...e.de>
>> ---
> 
>> -	writel(virt_to_phys(owl_secondary_startup),
>> +	writel(virt_to_phys(secondary_startup),
>> 	       timer_base_addr + OWL_CPU1_ADDR + (cpu - 1) * 4);
> 
> This is a kernel symbol so please use __pa_symbol() here, also you might want to build with CONFIG_DEBUG_VIRTUAL and see if you get other warnings about using virt_to_phys() in the owl platform code (I did not check if there are other uses)

Thanks for the report. There are no other such uses in mach-actions, but
git-grep'ing for virt_to_phys in arch/arm/mach-* I spot at least one
other such usage in mach-oxnas:

arch/arm/mach-oxnas/platsmp.c:
writel(virt_to_phys(ox820_secondary_startup),

as well as this in mach-mvebu:

arch/arm/mach-mvebu/platsmp.c:  writel(virt_to_phys(boot_addr), base +
MV98DX3236_CPU_RESUME_ADDR_REG);

and these in mach-at91:

arch/arm/mach-at91/pm.c:        pm_bu->canary = virt_to_phys(&canary);
arch/arm/mach-at91/pm.c:        pm_bu->resume = virt_to_phys(cpu_resume);

What exactly is the difference between the two macros that makes it
wrong despite apparently working? In particular I am wondering whether
the SoC/board vendors in CC need to fix it in their 3.10 trees, too.

In any case if this is a bug, I would rather fix it in a separate patch
for 4.13 and leave the name swap (this patch) for 4.14.

Regards,
Andreas

-- 
SUSE Linux GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton
HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)