[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.10.1707061409300.3798@vshiva-Udesk>
Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2017 14:09:40 -0700 (PDT)
From: Shivappa Vikas <vikas.shivappa@...el.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
cc: Vikas Shivappa <vikas.shivappa@...ux.intel.com>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, hpa@...or.com, peterz@...radead.org,
ravi.v.shankar@...el.com, vikas.shivappa@...el.com,
tony.luck@...el.com, fenghua.yu@...el.com, andi.kleen@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/21] x86/intel_rdt: Simplify info and base file lists
On Sun, 2 Jul 2017, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Jun 2017, Vikas Shivappa wrote:
>> @@ -82,6 +82,7 @@ struct rdt_resource rdt_resources_all[] = {
>> },
>> .parse_ctrlval = parse_cbm,
>> .format_str = "%d=%0*x",
>> + .fflags = RFTYPE_RES_CACHE,
>> },
>
> Can you please convert that array to use explicit array member
> initializers? I've noticed this back when I reviewed the intial RDT
> implementation, but it somehow escaped. i.e.:
>
> [RESOURCE_ID] =
> {
> .....
> }
Will fix.
Thanks,
Vikas
>
> Thanks,
>
> tglx
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists