[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170707081120.ht2gxuzpytoq2by4@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2017 10:11:20 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@...mail.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@...hat.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched/cputime: Fix using smp_processor_id() in
preemptible
On Thu, Jul 06, 2017 at 08:18:41PM -0700, Wanpeng Li wrote:
> --- a/kernel/sched/cputime.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/cputime.c
> @@ -683,7 +683,7 @@ static u64 vtime_delta(struct vtime *vtime)
> {
> unsigned long long clock;
>
> - clock = sched_clock_cpu(smp_processor_id());
> + clock = sched_clock();
> if (clock < vtime->starttime)
> return 0;
>
This is broken. sched_clock_cpu() and sched_clock() do not have the
exact same value :-/
So this ends up doing:
vtime->starttime = sched_clock_cpu(cpu);
/* ... */
clock = sched_clock();
delta = clock - vtime->starttime;
And you compute a delta using two different clocks.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists