[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2017 10:31:00 +0100
From: Jose Abreu <Jose.Abreu@...opsys.com>
To: Sylwester Nawrocki <snawrocki@...nel.org>,
Jose Abreu <Jose.Abreu@...opsys.com>
CC: <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Carlos Palminha" <CARLOS.PALMINHA@...opsys.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
Hans Verkuil <hans.verkuil@...co.com>,
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 4/4] dt-bindings: media: Document Synopsys Designware
HDMI RX
On 06-07-2017 21:30, Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
> On 07/06/2017 12:24 PM, Jose Abreu wrote:
>>>> +- edid-phandle: phandle to the EDID handler block.
>>> Could you make this property optional and when it is missing assume that device
>>> corresponding to the parent node of this node handles EDID? This way we could
>>> avoid having property pointing to the parent node.
>> Hmm, this is for the CEC notifier. Do you mean I should grab the
>> parent device for the notifier? This property is already optional
>> if cec is not enabled though.
>
> Yes, device associated with the parent node. Something like:
>
> - edid-phandle - phandle to the EDID handler block; if this property is
> not specified it is assumed that EDID is handled by device described
> by parent node of the HDMI RX node
>
> Not sure if it is any better than always requiring edid-phandle property,
> even when it is pointing to the parent node. We would need a DT maintainer's
> opinion on that.
I will change and resend. I also have to fix a kbuild error when
cec is not enabled.
Best regards,
Jose Miguel Abreu
>
> --
> Thanks,
> Sylwester
Powered by blists - more mailing lists