[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170707102527.bg7ktbkazxl3qpqt@linutronix.de>
Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2017 12:25:28 +0200
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
To: Alex Shi <alex.shi@...aro.org>
Cc: open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@...aro.org>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
linux-rt-users <linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpu_pm: replace raw_notifier to atomic_notifier
On 2017-07-06 16:47:46 [+0800], Alex Shi wrote:
> This patch replace a rwlock and raw notifier by atomic notifier which
+ is
> protected by spin_lock and rcu.
…
> Sebastian suggested using atomic_notifier instead of rwlock, which is not
> only removing the sleeping in idle, but also getting better latency
> improvement.
Did you measure this / have numbers or did you write this because this
is what RCU does in general?
Acked-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
Sebastian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists