linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/5] powernv:idle: Move device-tree parsing to one place.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sat, 8 Jul 2017 18:42:53 +1000
From:   Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>
To:     Gautham R Shenoy <ego@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc:     Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
        Michael Neuling <mikey@...ling.org>,
        Vaidyanathan Srinivasan <svaidy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Shilpasri G Bhat <shilpa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
        Akshay Adiga <akshay.adiga@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-pm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] powernv:idle: Move device-tree parsing to one
 place.

On Fri, 7 Jul 2017 16:55:39 +0530
Gautham R Shenoy <ego@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:

> Hello Nicholas,
> 
> On Fri, Jul 07, 2017 at 12:53:40AM +1000, Nicholas Piggin wrote:

> > I wouldn't have the wrapper function... but it's your code so it's
> > up to you. One thing though is that this function you have called get_
> > just to return the pointer, but it does not take a reference or
> > allocate memory or initialize the structure. Other functions with the
> > same prefix do such things. Can we make something more consistent?  
> 
> I agree with the wrapper function. But then the alternative was to
> declare this variable as an extern so that cpuidle can access it. Is
> that preferable ?

Yeah I think that's fine.

[snip

> > [snip]
> > 
> > There's a lot of code movement, I haven't reviewed it all carefully, but
> > it looks good in general. I'll apply the patches and check the result
> > in the next few days when I get a bit of time.  
> 
> If it helps, I will post the subsequent version breaking this patch
> into smaller ones.

If you could without too much trouble, that would be a good help.

Thanks,
Nick