[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <86fue72rey.fsf@arm.com>
Date: Sat, 08 Jul 2017 10:45:25 +0100
From: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>
To: Paul Menzel <pmenzel@...gen.mpg.de>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: irq: Invalid fwnode type (2) for irqdomain
On Sat, Jul 08 2017 at 9:28:17 am BST, Paul Menzel <pmenzel@...gen.mpg.de> wrote:
Hi Paul,
>> I've been reported an issue that is somewhat related to this, Any
>> chance you could give this[1] a go? I have no way to test it...
>
> The commit below indeed made the warning go away.
>
>> commit 6bf31c05f2a967e5351a3050ef51c18c8c9ee291
>> Author: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>
>> Date: Thu Jul 6 14:51:31 2017 +0100
>>
>> irqdomain: Allow ACPI device nodes to be used as irqdomain identifiers
>>
>> A number of irqchip implementations are (ab)using the irqdomain
>> allocator by passing a fwnode that is neither a FWNODE_OF or
>> a FWNODE_IRQCHIP.
>>
>> This is pretty bad, but it also feels pretty crap to force these
>> drivers to allocate their own irqchip_fwid when they already have
>> a proper fwnode.
>>
>> Instead, let's teach the irqdomain allocator about ACPI device
>> nodes, and add some lovely name generation code... Tested on
>> an arm64 D05 system.
>>
>> Reported-by: John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>
>
> I wonder if a warning/debug messages could and should still be shown,
> if a fwnode is neither a FWNODE_OF or a FWNODE_IRQCHIP.
With this patch, the code covers FWNODE_OF, FWNODE_IRQCHIP and
FWNODE_ACPI (the latter being the case you and John uncovered). Should
we get any other fwnode_type value, the irqdomain code will still warn
the user that this is not an object type we're ready to accept.
Thanks again for the report and the testing.
M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists