[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170708135316.GA277@x4>
Date: Sat, 8 Jul 2017 15:53:16 +0200
From: Markus Trippelsdorf <markus@...ppelsdorf.de>
To: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: commit 67d7ddded32 (waitid(2): leave copyout of siginfo to
syscall itself) breaks glibc posix/tst-waitid
On 2017.07.08 at 14:12 +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 08, 2017 at 11:56:44AM +0200, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
> > Since:
> > commit 67d7ddded322db99f451a7959d56ed6c70a6c4aa
> > Author: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
> > Date: Sun May 14 20:53:13 2017 -0400
> >
> > waitid(2): leave copyout of siginfo to syscall itself
> >
> > the glibc posix/tst-waitid.c testcase fails:
> >
> > markus@x4 glibc-build % ./posix/tst-waitid
> > waitid WNOHANG on stopped status 0
>
> I think I see what's going on... We lose the distinction between "got
> a PID" and "nothing, but that's not an error" a bit too early waitid()
> case. Could you see if there are any problems left with the following
> applied?
No, everything looks nice now. Thanks.
--
Markus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists