linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH]

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CY4PR07MB3176500E5C6C969175CB526DF0A80@CY4PR07MB3176.namprd07.prod.outlook.com>
Date:   Sun, 9 Jul 2017 23:54:38 +0000
From:   "Kershner, David A" <David.Kershner@...sys.com>
To:     armetallica <armetallica@...il.com>,
        "gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
CC:     *S-Par-Maintainer <SParMaintainer@...sys.com>,
        "devel@...verdev.osuosl.org" <devel@...verdev.osuosl.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: armetallica [mailto:armetallica@...il.com]
> Sent: Sunday, July 9, 2017 7:58 PM
> To: gregkh@...uxfoundation.org
> Cc: *S-Par-Maintainer <SParMaintainer@...sys.com>;
> devel@...verdev.osuosl.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
> Subject: [PATCH]
> 
> From bb1aac6ae6b21b903d8743712e21aeb1a6b22163 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00
> 2001
> From: Armin Schoenlieb <armetallica@...il.com>
> Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2017 01:52:41 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH] staging: unisys: visorbus: fix brace coding style issue in
>  visorbus_main.c This is a patch to the visorbus_main.c file that fixes up six
>  brace errors found by the checkpatch.pl tool
> 

Thanks for the patch! It looks like I sent up a patch to Greg that addresses this
issue on 6/30/2017:
 
	[PATCH 25/25] staging: unisys: visorbus: fix improper bracket blocks

Also, your patch come in with a subject of just the word [PATCH] and the patch
comment was messed up. I'm not sure how you generated the patch, but you
might want to try it with format-patch and then do a git send-email to yourself
as a dry-run to see if the patch looks OK when you get it.

David Kershner


> Signed-off-by: Armin Schoenlieb <armetallica@...il.com>
> ---
>  drivers/staging/unisys/visorbus/visorbus_main.c | 18 ++++++++++++------
>  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/unisys/visorbus/visorbus_main.c
> b/drivers/staging/unisys/visorbus/visorbus_main.c
> index 1c785dd19ddd..c56496269fc8 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/unisys/visorbus/visorbus_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/unisys/visorbus/visorbus_main.c
> @@ -270,7 +270,8 @@ static const struct attribute_group
> *visorbus_channel_groups[] = {
> 
>  static ssize_t partition_handle_show(struct device *dev,
>  				     struct device_attribute *attr,
> -				     char *buf) {
> +				     char *buf)
> +{
>  	struct visor_device *vdev = to_visor_device(dev);
>  	u64 handle = visorchannel_get_clientpartition(vdev->visorchannel);
> 
> @@ -280,7 +281,8 @@ static DEVICE_ATTR_RO(partition_handle);
> 
>  static ssize_t partition_guid_show(struct device *dev,
>  				   struct device_attribute *attr,
> -				   char *buf) {
> +				   char *buf)
> +{
>  	struct visor_device *vdev = to_visor_device(dev);
> 
>  	return sprintf(buf, "{%pUb}\n", &vdev->partition_uuid);
> @@ -289,7 +291,8 @@ static DEVICE_ATTR_RO(partition_guid);
> 
>  static ssize_t partition_name_show(struct device *dev,
>  				   struct device_attribute *attr,
> -				   char *buf) {
> +				   char *buf)
> +{
>  	struct visor_device *vdev = to_visor_device(dev);
> 
>  	return sprintf(buf, "%s\n", vdev->name);
> @@ -298,7 +301,8 @@ static DEVICE_ATTR_RO(partition_name);
> 
>  static ssize_t channel_addr_show(struct device *dev,
>  				 struct device_attribute *attr,
> -				 char *buf) {
> +				 char *buf)
> +{
>  	struct visor_device *vdev = to_visor_device(dev);
>  	u64 addr = visorchannel_get_physaddr(vdev->visorchannel);
> 
> @@ -308,7 +312,8 @@ static DEVICE_ATTR_RO(channel_addr);
> 
>  static ssize_t channel_bytes_show(struct device *dev,
>  				  struct device_attribute *attr,
> -				  char *buf) {
> +				  char *buf)
> +{
>  	struct visor_device *vdev = to_visor_device(dev);
>  	u64 nbytes = visorchannel_get_nbytes(vdev->visorchannel);
> 
> @@ -318,7 +323,8 @@ static DEVICE_ATTR_RO(channel_bytes);
> 
>  static ssize_t channel_id_show(struct device *dev,
>  			       struct device_attribute *attr,
> -			       char *buf) {
> +			       char *buf)
> +{
>  	struct visor_device *vdev = to_visor_device(dev);
>  	int len = 0;
> 
> --
> 2.11.0