[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1499673451-66160-9-git-send-email-keescook@chromium.org>
Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2017 00:57:31 -0700
From: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Serge Hallyn <serge@...lyn.com>,
John Johansen <john.johansen@...onical.com>,
Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
"Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
James Morris <james.l.morris@...cle.com>,
Greg Ungerer <gerg@...ux-m68k.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@...aro.org>,
Stephen Smalley <sds@...ho.nsa.gov>,
Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>,
Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>,
Mickaël Salaün <mic@...ikod.net>,
Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.sakura.ne.jp>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, selinux@...ho.nsa.gov
Subject: [PATCH v2 8/8] exec: Use sane stack rlimit under secureexec
For a secureexec, before memory layout selection has happened, reset the
stack rlimit to something sane to avoid the caller having control over
the resulting layouts.
$ ulimit -s
8192
$ ulimit -s unlimited
$ /bin/sh -c 'ulimit -s'
unlimited
$ sudo /bin/sh -c 'ulimit -s'
8192
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
---
fs/exec.c | 10 ++++++++++
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
diff --git a/fs/exec.c b/fs/exec.c
index e0186db02f90..1e3463854a16 100644
--- a/fs/exec.c
+++ b/fs/exec.c
@@ -1343,6 +1343,16 @@ void setup_new_exec(struct linux_binprm * bprm)
/* Make sure parent cannot signal privileged process. */
current->pdeath_signal = 0;
+
+ /*
+ * For secureexec, reset the stack limit to sane default to
+ * avoid bad behavior from the prior rlimits. This has to
+ * happen before arch_pick_mmap_layout(), which examines
+ * RLIMIT_STACK, but after the point of no return to avoid
+ * needing to clean up the change on failure.
+ */
+ if (current->signal->rlim[RLIMIT_STACK].rlim_cur > _STK_LIM)
+ current->signal->rlim[RLIMIT_STACK].rlim_cur = _STK_LIM;
}
arch_pick_mmap_layout(current->mm);
--
2.7.4
Powered by blists - more mailing lists