[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170710080712.3oyktu3pjdbgxx7k@dell>
Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2017 09:07:12 +0100
From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@...hile0.org>
Cc: Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
Aaro Koskinen <aaro.koskinen@....fi>,
Benoît Cousson <bcousson@...libre.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
"linux-omap@...r.kernel.org" <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Linux I2C <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH v6 0/8] mfd: Add OF device table to I2C drivers
that are missing it
On Mon, 10 Jul 2017, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> Hello Lee,
>
> On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 8:49 PM, Javier Martinez Canillas
> <javier@...hile0.org> wrote:
> >
> > This series add OF device ID tables to mfd I2C drivers whose devices are
> > either used in Device Tree source files or are listed in binding docs as
> > a compatible string.
> >
> > That's done because the plan is to change the I2C core to report proper OF
> > modaliases instead of always reporting a MODALIAS=i2c:<foo> regardless if
> > a device was registered via DT or using the legacy platform data mechanism.
> >
> > So these patches will make sure that mfd I2C drivers modules will continue
> > to be autoloaded once the I2C core is changed to report proper OF modalias.
> >
> > Users didn't have a vendor prefix in the used compatible strings, but since
> > there wasn't a DT binding document for these drivers, it can be said that
> > were working for mere luck and so this series fixes the users and add a DT
> > binding doc for the drivers.
> >
> > Most patches can be applied independently, with the exception of patches
> > 2 to 4 that should be applied in the same tree to keep bisect-ability. I
> > suggest these to go through the MFD subsystem tree.
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Javier
> >
>
> Are you planning to pick this series? It has been in the list for
> months and were resent many times...
I think you exaggerate a little. Your last Ack (from Linus) was only
collected in v6, which has only been resent once with that Ack
applied. =:)
We are currently only half way through the merge-window. This patch
will be hoovered up during the early -rcs. Please be patient around
the time of the merge-window, since Maintainers are either usually
very busy with pull-requests, or taking a 2 minute breather before
the chaos starts over.
--
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists