linux-kernel - Re: [patch 1/3] tty: resolve tty contention between kernel and user space

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 10 Jul 2017 09:31:05 +0100
From:   Okash Khawaja <okash.khawaja@...il.com>
To:     Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.com>,
        Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@...-lyon.org>,
        Alan Cox <gnomes@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        William Hubbs <w.d.hubbs@...il.com>,
        Chris Brannon <chris@...-brannons.com>,
        Kirk Reiser <kirk@...sers.ca>, speakup@...ux-speakup.org,
        devel@...verdev.osuosl.org
Subject: Re: [patch 1/3] tty: resolve tty contention between kernel and user
 space

On Sun, Jul 09, 2017 at 06:04:17PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 9, 2017 at 2:41 PM, Okash Khawaja <okash.khawaja@...il.com> wrote:
> 
> > +struct tty_struct *tty_kopen(dev_t device)
> > +{
> > +       struct tty_struct *tty;
> > +       struct tty_driver *driver = NULL;
> > +       int index = -1;
> > +
> > +       mutex_lock(&tty_mutex);
> > +       driver = tty_lookup_driver(device, NULL, &index);
> > +       if (IS_ERR(driver)) {
> 
> > +               mutex_unlock(&tty_mutex);
> > +               return ERR_CAST(driver);
> 
> Hmm... perhaps
> 
> tty = ERR_CAST(driver);
> goto out_unlock;
> 
> See below for further details.
> 
Sorry missed this one out. Since tty_lookup_driver has failed, we don't
need to down the refcount on driver. So we can return here, without
going to out_unlock.

Thanks,
Okash