[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170710084533.bl6znx5g2owalbx6@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2017 10:45:33 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] scheduler changes for v4.13
* Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com> wrote:
> On 07/03/2017 01:39 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > Linus,
> >
> > Please pull the latest sched-core-for-linus git tree from:
> >
> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git sched-core-for-linus
> >
> > # HEAD: 72298e5c92c50edd8cb7cfda4519483ce65fa166 sched/cputime: Refactor the cputime_adjust() code
> >
> > The main changes in this cycle were:
> >
> > - Add the SYSTEM_SCHEDULING bootup state to move various scheduler debug checks
> > earlier into the bootup. This turns silent and sporadically deadly bugs into
> > nice, deterministic splats. Fix some of the splats that triggered.
> > (Thomas Gleixner)
> >
> > - A round of restructuring and refactoring of the load-balancing and topology
> > code (Peter Zijlstra)
> >
> > - Another round of consolidating ~20 of incremental scheduler code history: this
> > time in terms of wait-queue nomenclature. (I didn't get much feedback on these
> > renaming patches, and we can still easily change any names I might have
> > misplaced, so if anyone hates a new name, please holler and I'll fix it.)
> > (Ingo Molnar)
>
> This commit ac6424b981bce1c4bc55675c6ce11bfe1bbfa64f ("sched/wait:
> Rename wait_queue_t => wait_queue_entry_t") ends up renaming the
> autofs_packet_missing, autofs_packet_expire_multi and autofs_v5_packet
> member previously named wait_queue_entry to wait_queue_entry_token. Was
> it intentional to force an user space build breakage when building
> against v4.13-rc headers for autofs headers?
Nope - mind sending a tested patch?
Thanks,
Ingo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists