[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170710112229.GA18040@leverpostej>
Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2017 12:22:29 +0100
From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
To: Ding Tianhong <dingtianhong@...wei.com>,
Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
LinuxArm <linuxarm@...wei.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND] arm64: arch_timer: fix the infinite recursion
when enable ftrace and erratum workaround
On Sun, Jul 09, 2017 at 04:30:54PM +0800, Ding Tianhong wrote:
> When enable preempt and debug ftrace, and perform the following steps, the
> system will hang:
> mount -t debugfs nodev /sys/kernel/debug/
> cd /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/
> echo function_graph > current_tracer
>
> This is because tracing the preempt_disable/enable calls would cause
> trace_clock() which would get local timer to go into infinite recursion
> when enable the arch timer erratum workaround for some chips, so Prevent
> tracing of preempt_disable/enable() in arch_timer_reg_read_stable().
>
> This problem is similar to the fixed by upstream commit 96b3d28bf4
> ("sched/clock: Prevent tracing recursion in sched_clock_cpu()").
As I mentioned before, the patch itself looks fine to me, but the commit
message is somewhat difficult to read.
Can we please change this to:
arm64: arch_timer: avoid infinite recursion when ftrace is enabled
On platforms with an arch timer erratum workaround, it's possible for
arch_timer_reg_read_stable() to recurse into itself when certain
tracing options are enabled, leading to stack overflows and related
problems.
For example, when PREEMPT_TRACER and FUNCTION_GRAPH_TRACER are
selected, it's possible to trigger this with:
$ mount -t debugfs nodev /sys/kernel/debug/
$ echo function_graph > /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/current_tracer
The problem is that in such cases, preempt_disable() instrumentation
attempts to acquire a timestamp via trace_clock(), resulting in a call
back to arch_timer_reg_read_stable(), and hence recursion.
This patch changes arch_timer_reg_read_stable() to use
preempt_{disable,enable}_notrace(), which avoids this.
With that commit message:
Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Daniel, Thomas, would you be happy to fold that in when picking this? Or
would you prefer that I fix this up and resend?
Thanks,
Mark.
> Fixes: 6acc71ccac71 ("arm64: arch_timer: Allows a CPU-specific erratum to only affect a subset of CPUs")
> Signed-off-by: Ding Tianhong <dingtianhong@...wei.com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/include/asm/arch_timer.h | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/arch_timer.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/arch_timer.h
> index 74d08e4..67bb7a4 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/arch_timer.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/arch_timer.h
> @@ -65,13 +65,13 @@ struct arch_timer_erratum_workaround {
> u64 _val; \
> if (needs_unstable_timer_counter_workaround()) { \
> const struct arch_timer_erratum_workaround *wa; \
> - preempt_disable(); \
> + preempt_disable_notrace(); \
> wa = __this_cpu_read(timer_unstable_counter_workaround); \
> if (wa && wa->read_##reg) \
> _val = wa->read_##reg(); \
> else \
> _val = read_sysreg(reg); \
> - preempt_enable(); \
> + preempt_enable_notrace(); \
> } else { \
> _val = read_sysreg(reg); \
> } \
> --
> 1.9.0
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists