linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4/6] irqchip: brcmstb-l2: Remove some processing from the handler

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <3a27d1b1-23ca-3237-92ba-d91299448f33@gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 10 Jul 2017 08:53:55 -0700
From:   Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
To:     Doug Berger <opendmb@...il.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc:     Kevin Cernekee <cernekee@...il.com>,
        Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
        Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>,
        Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>,
        Gregory Fong <gregory.0xf0@...il.com>,
        "maintainer:BROADCOM BCM7XXX ARM ARCHITECTURE" 
        <bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com>,
        "open list:BROADCOM BMIPS MIPS ARCHITECTURE" 
        <linux-mips@...ux-mips.org>,
        "open list:IRQCHIP DRIVERS" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "moderated list:BROADCOM BCM7XXX ARM ARCHITECTURE" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] irqchip: brcmstb-l2: Remove some processing from the
 handler

On 07/07/2017 12:20 PM, Doug Berger wrote:
> Saving the generic chip pointer in the brcmstb_l2_intc_data prevents
> the need to call irq_get_domain_generic_chip().  Also don't need to
> save parent_irq and base there since local variables in the
> brcmstb_l2_intc_of_init() function are just as good.
> 
> The handle_edge_irq flow or chained_irq_enter takes care of the
> acknowledgement of the interrupt so it is redundant to clear it in
> brcmstb_l2_intc_irq_handle().
> 
> irq_linear_revmap() is a fast path equivalent of irq_find_mapping()
> that is appropriate to use for domain controllers of this type.
> 
> Defining irq_mask_ack is slightly more efficient than just
> implementing irq_mask and irq_ack seperately.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Doug Berger <opendmb@...il.com>

Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
-- 
Florian