[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170710165420.GC4964@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2017 12:54:21 -0400
From: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@...hat.com>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>,
David Nellans <dnellans@...dia.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Balbir Singh <bsingharora@...il.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@...il.com>,
cgroups@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] mm/memcontrol: allow to uncharge page without using
page->lru field
On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 06:36:52PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Mon 10-07-17 12:25:42, Jerome Glisse wrote:
> [...]
> > Bottom line is that we can always free and uncharge device memory
> > page just like any regular page.
>
> OK, this answers my earlier question. Then it should be feasible to
> charge this memory. There are still some things to handle. E.g. how do
> we consider this memory during oom victim selection (this is not
> accounted as an anonymous memory in get_mm_counter, right?), maybe others.
> But the primary point is that nobody pins the memory outside of the
> mapping.
At this point it is accounted as a regular page would be (anonymous, file
or share memory). I wanted mm_counters to reflect memcg but i can untie
that. Like i said at this point we are unsure how usage of such memory
will impact thing so i wanted to keep all thing as if it was regular
memory to avoid anuything to behave too much differently.
Jérôme
Powered by blists - more mailing lists