lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+55aFzjipYWMQsrXpd2SAQVk61txbmuttz2_Au8qHGkMnXpQw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 10 Jul 2017 10:05:26 -0700
From:   Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:     Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>
Cc:     Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] HID for 4.13

On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 2:24 AM, Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org> wrote:
>
>   git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jikos/hid.git for-linus

I've pulled this, but looking at the thing, I absolutely _hate_ your
merge commits.

They have no commit messages! They look like this:

    Merge branches 'for-4.13/ish' and 'for-4.13/ite' into for-linus

    Conflicts:
            drivers/hid/hid-core.c

which doesn't tell anybody anything.

Please. If you can't make a message for a merge, don't do the merge.
Send me the separate branches instead.

Or just write useful merge messages.

It's possible that you're running some truly ancient git version that
didn't start an editor by default for merges. If so, upgrade your git
install.

Either way, it's not ok to do merges without explanations. We have
higher standards for kernel history than that.

              Linus

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ