linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] Pull request for 4.13 for IPMI

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CA+55aFxMZASFXjDzbPJgGV29_S44Cpu9PnLOKXC8rQ_7GoXJkg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 10 Jul 2017 10:12:57 -0700
From:   Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:     Corey Minyard <minyard@....org>
Cc:     linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "openipmi-developer@...ts.sourceforge.net" 
        <openipmi-developer@...ts.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Pull request for 4.13 for IPMI

On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 5:47 AM, Corey Minyard <minyard@....org> wrote:
>
>   https://github.com/cminyard/linux-ipmi.git tags/for-linus-4.13

Hmm.

This is signed using a completely new key.

That part is fine: the new key is 4k bits instead of the old 1k key.

But the new key is signed by absolutely nothing - not even the old key.

That makes the new key entirely pointless, and I'm not going to pull
from a github account with absolutely nothing to show that it's the
saem Corey Minyard.

Can you please at least self-sign with your old key?

Because even if you *yourself* don't trust the new key, why should I do so?

              Linus