[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170710230911.GH5610@bhelgaas-glaptop.roam.corp.google.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2017 18:09:11 -0500
From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>
To: Sinan Kaya <okaya@...eaurora.org>
Cc: linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, timur@...eaurora.org,
wim.ten.have@...cle.com, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] PCI: Do not enable extended tags on pre-dated (v1.x)
systems
On Fri, Jul 07, 2017 at 10:53:13AM -0400, Sinan Kaya wrote:
> According to extended tags ECN document, all PCIe receivers are expected
> to support extended tags support. It should be safe to enable extended
> tags on endpoints without checking compatibility.
>
> This assumption seems to be working fine except for the legacy systems.
> The ECN has been written against PCIE spec version 2.0. Therefore, we need
> to exclude all version 1.0 devices from this change as there is HW out
> there that can't handle extended tags.
>
> Note that the default value of Extended Tags Enable bit is implementation
> specific. Therefore, we are clearing the bit by default when incompatible
> HW is found without assuming that value is zero.
The PCI_EXP_DEVCTL_EXT_TAG bit controls the behavior of the function as a
Requester. As far as I can see, it has nothing to do with whether the
function supports 8-bit tags as a *Completer*, so the implicit assumption
of the spec is that all Completers always support 8-bit tags. My guess is
that's why the ECN thought it would be safe to enable extended tags by
default.
If that's the case, this is just a defect in the device (the Completer),
and we should blacklist it. Looking at the PCIe Capability version might
happen to correlate with Completer support for 8-bit tags, but that looks
like just a coincidence to me.
> Reported-by: Wim ten Have <wim.ten.have@...cle.com>
> Link: https://pcisig.com/sites/default/files/specification_documents/ECN_Extended_Tag_Enable_Default_05Sept2008_final.pdf
> Link: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1467674
> Fixes: 60db3a4d8cc9 ("PCI: Enable PCIe Extended Tags if supported")
> Signed-off-by: Sinan Kaya <okaya@...eaurora.org>
> ---
> drivers/pci/probe.c | 45 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
> 1 file changed, 39 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/probe.c b/drivers/pci/probe.c
> index 19c8950..e3b3c18 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/probe.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/probe.c
> @@ -1684,21 +1684,51 @@ static void program_hpp_type2(struct pci_dev *dev, struct hpp_type2 *hpp)
> */
> }
>
> -static void pci_configure_extended_tags(struct pci_dev *dev)
> +static int pcie_bus_discover_legacy(struct pci_dev *dev, void *data)
> {
> + bool *found = data;
> + int rc;
> + u16 flags;
> +
> + if (!pci_is_pcie(dev))
> + return 0;
> +
> + rc = pcie_capability_read_word(dev, PCI_EXP_FLAGS, &flags);
> + if (!rc && ((flags & PCI_EXP_FLAGS_VERS) < 2))
> + *found = true;
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int pcie_bus_configure_exttags(struct pci_dev *dev, void *legacy)
> +{
> + bool supported = !*(bool *)legacy;
> u32 dev_cap;
> + u16 flags;
> int ret;
>
> if (!pci_is_pcie(dev))
> - return;
> + return 0;
> +
> + ret = pcie_capability_read_word(dev, PCI_EXP_FLAGS, &flags);
> + if (ret || ((flags & PCI_EXP_FLAGS_VERS) < 2))
> + return 0;
>
> ret = pcie_capability_read_dword(dev, PCI_EXP_DEVCAP, &dev_cap);
> - if (ret)
> - return;
> + if (ret || (!(dev_cap & PCI_EXP_DEVCAP_EXT_TAG)))
> + return 0;
>
> - if (dev_cap & PCI_EXP_DEVCAP_EXT_TAG)
> + if (supported) {
> + dev_dbg(&dev->dev, "setting extended tags capability\n");
> pcie_capability_set_word(dev, PCI_EXP_DEVCTL,
> PCI_EXP_DEVCTL_EXT_TAG);
> + } else {
> + dev_dbg(&dev->dev, "clearing extended tags capability\n");
> + pcie_capability_clear_word(dev, PCI_EXP_DEVCTL,
> + PCI_EXP_DEVCTL_EXT_TAG);
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> }
>
> static void pci_configure_device(struct pci_dev *dev)
> @@ -1707,7 +1737,6 @@ static void pci_configure_device(struct pci_dev *dev)
> int ret;
>
> pci_configure_mps(dev);
> - pci_configure_extended_tags(dev);
>
> memset(&hpp, 0, sizeof(hpp));
> ret = pci_get_hp_params(dev, &hpp);
> @@ -2201,6 +2230,7 @@ static int pcie_bus_configure_set(struct pci_dev *dev, void *data)
> void pcie_bus_configure_settings(struct pci_bus *bus)
> {
> u8 smpss = 0;
> + bool legacy_found = false;
>
> if (!bus->self)
> return;
> @@ -2224,6 +2254,9 @@ void pcie_bus_configure_settings(struct pci_bus *bus)
>
> pcie_bus_configure_set(bus->self, &smpss);
> pci_walk_bus(bus, pcie_bus_configure_set, &smpss);
> +
> + pci_walk_bus(bus, pcie_bus_discover_legacy, &legacy_found);
> + pci_walk_bus(bus, pcie_bus_configure_exttags, &legacy_found);
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pcie_bus_configure_settings);
>
> --
> 1.9.1
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists