[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1499753648.8257.3.camel@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2017 08:14:08 +0200
From: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@...hat.com>
To: Kirti Wankhede <kwankhede@...dia.com>,
Tina Zhang <tina.zhang@...el.com>, alex.williamson@...hat.com,
chris@...is-wilson.co.uk, zhenyuw@...ux.intel.com,
zhiyuan.lv@...el.com, zhi.a.wang@...el.com, kevin.tian@...el.com,
daniel@...ll.ch
Cc: intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org,
intel-gvt-dev@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10] vfio: ABI for mdev display dma-buf operation
Hi,
> > +struct vfio_device_query_gfx_plane {
> > + __u32 argsz;
> > + __u32 flags;
> > + struct vfio_device_gfx_plane_info plane_info;
> > + __u32 plane_type;
> > + __s32 fd; /* dma-buf fd */
> > + __u32 plane_id;
> > +};
> > +
>
> It would be better to have comment here about what are expected
> values
> for plane_type and plane_id.
plane_type is DRM_PLANE_TYPE_*.
yes, a comment saying so would be good, same for drm_format which is
DRM_FORMAT_*. While looking at these two: renaming plane_type to
drm_plane_type (for consistency) is probably a good idea too.
plane_id needs a specification.
cheers,
Gerd
Powered by blists - more mailing lists