[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c97943ea-0972-49b5-49fd-3bf939d7c7ad@linaro.org>
Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2017 22:39:24 +0800
From: Alex Shi <alex.shi@...aro.org>
To: peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...hat.com, corbet@....net,
"open list:LOCKING PRIMITIVES" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:DOCUMENTATION" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Sebastian Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@....com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] rtmutex: remove unnecessary adjust prio
Any comments for this little change? It's passed on 0day testing.
Thanks
Alex
On 07/07/2017 10:52 AM, Alex Shi wrote:
> We don't need to adjust prio before new pi_waiter adding. The prio
> only need update after pi_waiter change or task priority change.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alex Shi <alex.shi@...aro.org>
> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
> Cc: Sebastian Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
> Cc: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>
> Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@....com>
> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
> To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
> To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
> To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
> ---
> kernel/locking/rtmutex.c | 1 -
> 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c b/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c
> index 28cd09e..d1fe41f 100644
> --- a/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c
> +++ b/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c
> @@ -963,7 +963,6 @@ static int task_blocks_on_rt_mutex(struct rt_mutex *lock,
> return -EDEADLK;
>
> raw_spin_lock(&task->pi_lock);
> - rt_mutex_adjust_prio(task);
> waiter->task = task;
> waiter->lock = lock;
> waiter->prio = task->prio;
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists