[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170711172548.GA5530@kroah.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2017 19:25:48 +0200
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Gaurav Pathak <gauravpathak129@...il.com>
Cc: lkp@...el.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, joe@...ches.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: rts5208: Replace embedded function names with
"%s: ", __func__
On Fri, Jul 07, 2017 at 09:29:10PM +0530, Gaurav Pathak wrote:
> staging: rts5208: Avoid possible defects when refactoring.
>
> Signed-off-by: Gaurav Pathak <gauravpathak129@...il.com>
> ---
> drivers/staging/rts5208/ms.c | 5 +++--
> drivers/staging/rts5208/rtsx.c | 4 ++--
> drivers/staging/rts5208/rtsx_chip.c | 4 ++--
> drivers/staging/rts5208/sd.c | 28 +++++++++++++++-------------
> drivers/staging/rts5208/spi.c | 8 +++++---
> drivers/staging/rts5208/xd.c | 17 ++++++++++-------
> 6 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
You sent two patches with the same subject, yet they are different.
Which one am I supposed to pick? I'll drop both, please always properly
version your patches when you resend them.
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists